Biases up front.
I am no lover of Sheriff Joe Arpaio. The publicity-seeking, the grandstanding — that is not a good style to get a lawman. Along with the following might lead to the revocation of my entire Right-Wing Conspiracy Platinum Card, but I did not approve of his treatment of offenders. The tent cities. The underwear. The piping in of classical and patriotic music.
I am all in favor of gearing up constitutionally convicted men, most notably violent guys. But once we got somebody, it’s our responsibility to be as humane as possible. I am not speaking saunas and feather pillows. But there’s not anything wrong with good food, televisions and ac.
Need to admit that not everyone in jail is deserving of vengeance. Arpaio prisoners was gratuitous and arbitrary. It serves no intention treat every man like the prisoner.
But the hysterical overreaction to Sheriff Joe of the Left left him a figure than that he might have been differently. To many, regardless of, Arpaio’s defiance of all all the right people (leftists, Democrats, the media) made him a heroic figure.
And in the end, even after voters turned Sheriff Joe to former-Sheriff Joe, it had been all the right individuals who overreached, who had their own kind of vengeance, who abused their own power. Guilty of nothing more than enforcing this legislation, the 85 year-old was convicted (by a judge) of contempt of court and faced the chance for 6 months in p****n. To call this a travesty of justice is beyond understatement. Therefore…
President Trump’s determination to give Arpaio a “complete and unconditional pardon” was awesome, and not just an appropriate use of his inherent powers, it was a brave decision, one which righted yet another instance of the judicial tyranny that so plagues our country. Here are three reasons why…
1. Sheriff Joe Can Be Guilty Only of Upholding the Legislation
When unelected thugs attempt to usurp the power of these folks, the only time I get nervous about this American experiment with ours is. I am speaking about our robed masters, those we call judges. Some judges have been elected, most are not many are appointed for life; also this also guarantee that you will never lose your occupation strains hacks.
The duty of a judge is to interpret the law. Still, a lot of judges produce laws from material, and nearly every time that they are Leftists.
Then there’s the flipside, if a thug aids and abets a politician breaking the legislation, and that’s what Barry Obama has been guilty of in regards to a lot of things, but most notably immigration law. As a way to flooding Red States with Democrats that were prohibited, Barry flagrantly violated the legislation and also lawless judges gave atmosphere cover to him.
Those fighting against Trump’s pardon rest a lot of the situation about the fact that a judge’s direct order was violated by Arpaio. What exactly? Immigration was illegally legalized by that judge’s order. Obviously, with the support of a tainted media, this contempt charge has been window dressed with all the proper buzzwords such as “racial profiling,” but if Arpaio’s guilty of that, charge him with that.
Sheriff Joe swore to maintain the legislation, not to maintain illegal orders given with a lawless president along with his robed minions.
2. Sheriff Joe Was Denied a Jury Trial
The justice system operates every other branch of the inept government and is undoubtedly the finest on the planet. This is because of the fact that it’s politicians, elites, bureaucrats, not professionals, attorneys or judges who decide guilt or innocence. You and I make your decision. And for the most part, we get it right. We’re not perfect. But we’re as great as anyone could hope for.
You see, at these jury rooms, exactly what cable news will say or we do not worry becoming our standing in The Club or re-elected or about our professions. We stress about living with the amazing responsibility of deciding a person’s fate. Obviously mistakes are made. But imagine how much our system would be at * shudder * Professional Jurors’ hands.
Sheriff Joe was not convicted by a jury of his peers. A judge convicted him. A single judge! In america of America, Arpaio asked and has been denied his right to a jury trial. I don’t care that Arizona enables this if the sentence is 6 months or not. The idea that one judge can decide any persons’ innocence or guilt would be un-American. In addition, I wonder if the potential sentence of Arpaio was crafted to avoid a jury trial.
No, from A to Z, this whole thing stinks.
3. All The Right People Are furious Over Trump’s Pardon
Once again something Trump did subjected the craven underbelly of the American Institution, the exact same Establishment that hardly batted an eye following Barry pardoned an outright traitor (Bradley/Chelsea Manning), an full-blown terrorist (Oscar Lopez-Rivera), along with innumerable d**g retailers. But pardoning of enforcing this legislation a lawman guilty — and worse, guilty of repeatedly sticking his finger in the eye — has made The gorgeous People apoplectic.
We had more evidence that our political and media elite, that the Morning Joe audience are self-righteous corruptocrats beyond all hope of salvation, but a different log onto that five-alarm fire not hurts.
Follow John Nolte on Twitter . Follow his Facebook Page .